When people hear about blockchain, they often imagine complicated computer code or confusing cryptocurrency jargon. But what if you could use a powerful blockchain without leaving your favorite chat app? That’s what’s happening with The Open Network (TON) and Telegram.
Telegram is a hugely popular messaging platform, serving more than 950 million users every month. TON, on the other hand, is a blockchain project designed to handle fast transactions at a large scale. Their partnership brings these worlds together so regular people—like you and me—can benefit from blockchain without wrestling with unfamiliar tools.
In this article, we’ll explore how TON became Telegram’s chosen blockchain, why Toncoin is the app’s only non-fiat currency, what this means for developers and everyday users, and also some debate surrounding the move.
TON Connect and Mini Apps
A major leap forward was the creation of TON Connect, which simplifies how blockchain services work within Telegram. Normally, if you want to do anything “on-chain” (a term that just means recorded on the blockchain), you must deal with wallets, password phrases, and lots of technical hurdles.
TON Connect hides most of that complexity. It acts like a secure tunnel between your Telegram account and a special TON-compatible wallet. Whenever you authorize a payment or other transaction, you can do it almost as easily as sending a text.
At the same time, Telegram introduced Mini Apps—compact applications you can open right inside a chat window. You don’t have to download anything extra or even leave the conversation. These Mini Apps handle many everyday needs, from playing games to booking tickets.
Now that TON Connect is a required piece of the puzzle for blockchain features, any Mini App that wants to use Toncoin or record data on the blockchain must run on TON. This rule keeps everything consistent for users, who no longer have to worry about switching between different blockchains.
Exclusivity of TON and Toncoin on Telegram
It might seem surprising at first, but Telegram actually stopped supporting every other blockchain in favor of TON. By focusing on just one option, Telegram removes a lot of the confusion that comes with juggling multiple networks. As a result, users get a cleaner experience, and TON gains a huge built-in audience. Now, anyone curious about blockchain can dive in directly through Telegram without needing extra software or a detailed tech background.
A similar story applies to Toncoin, which is now Telegram’s only cryptocurrency for non-fiat (meaning non-government-issued) payments. Whether buying ads or unlocking premium features, Toncoin is the exclusive digital currency. It encourages more people to give Toncoin a try, which could spark a bustling marketplace right within the app.
Tokenization of Digital Assets Within Telegram
Tokenization might sound intimidating, but it’s easier to grasp than you might think. In simple terms, “tokenizing” is a way to certify ownership of a digital item on the blockchain, like turning a sticker or emoji into a one-of-a-kind collectible. Telegram has announced it will roll out tokenized emojis, stickers, and limited-edition gifts, all recorded on TON’s network.
For everyday users, this could be as straightforward as buying an exclusive emoji pack with Toncoin. Once purchased, the items belong to you alone, and you can prove that ownership thanks to the blockchain’s public record.
In the future, Telegram may expand beyond stickers and emojis, turning other in-app features into digital collectibles. This could open up a new world of sharing, trading, and collecting—right inside your favorite messenger.
Potential Criticisms: Is ‘TON-Only’ the Right Path?
Some people are uneasy with Telegram’s choice to go all-in on TON. They point out that Web3, at its heart, is meant to be open, where different blockchains can connect and no single group controls everything. By focusing only on TON, Telegram might be straying from the idea of giving developers and users plenty of choices—essentially moving away from the “decentralized” spirit that Web3 stands for.
Another concern is whether TON can handle Telegram’s giant user base. Critics say TON’s current system isn’t as strong as some other networks, like Solana, which have more money flowing through them (liquidity) and can process more transactions quickly. If hundreds of millions of Telegram users suddenly start using TON, it might struggle to keep up.
Future Outlook
The collaboration between TON and Telegram has already changed how people view blockchain in everyday apps. As the partnership matures, we may see more stable services and possibly bigger leaps in technology. For example, TON might boost its network speed to handle a wave of new users, and Telegram could refine its Mini Apps to be even friendlier to non-technical audiences.
Still, some critics argue that an exclusive focus on TON may stray from the open, flexible nature of Web3. They question whether TON’s infrastructure can handle large-scale user demands and whether Telegram should have embraced an inclusive approach rather than only TON. Ultimately, the success of this partnership will depend on how it balances ease of use and performance with Web3’s principles of openness and decentralization.
Should Telegram’s approach take off, it wouldn’t be surprising if other popular apps and social networks follow suit. We might see a whole wave of exclusive blockchain deals that kick off a friendly rivalry in the tech world.
Editor’s note: Written with the assistance of AI – Edited and fact-checked by Jason Newey.
